CHRIS WALLACE, FNC: At a fund-raiser last year you said this, “The Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment.” Now, in the 2008 Heller case, the court said there’s a constitutional individual right to bear arms.
What’s wrong with that?
HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I think what the court said about there being an individual right is in line with constitutional thinking. And I said in the convention, I’m not looking to repeal the second amendment. I’m not looking to take people’s guns away, but I am looking for more support for the reasonable efforts that need to be undertaken to keep guns out of the wrong hands.
WALLACE: And the Second Amendment includes an individual right to bear arms.
CLINTON: Yes, but that right like every other of our rights, our First Amendment rights, every right that we have is open to and even subject to reasonable regulations.
WALLACE: I just want to pursue this a bit. Heller, Justice Scalia, he said that the right to bear arms is reasonably limited. He let the door open to regulation. If you’re elected president, you’re going to appoint the Ninth Supreme Court justice.
WALLACE: Are you saying you do not want to see the Heller decision, the individual right to bear arms overturned?
CLINTON: No, I don’t, but here’s what I do want. And I want to be very clear about this: I want the Congress to step up and do its job. I want to get out of the horrible cycle we’re in, where we go and mourn dozens, hundreds, thousands of people killed by gun violence.
Everybody says, oh, let’s pray, let’s send our hearts and our feelings, and then nothing happens. We’re better than this. The gun lobby intimidates elected officials. The vast majority of Americans, including gun owners, support the kind of common-sense reforms that I’m proposing.
Full article and video via: Clinton: Every Right That We Have Is Open To And Subject To Reasonable Regulations | Video | RealClearPolitics
There are several problems with this. First of all, as stated repeatedly, gun owners have already gone through their fair share of “reasonable” regulations. We always seem to be the ones taking the hit, and they want more and more without any stop.
Secondly, who decides what “reasonable” is? Because Hillary’s idea of reasonable is a little more extreme than what most think, and that goes for ALL of our rights, not just the 2A.