Judge Denies Pennsylvania Recount Petition And SLAMS Jill Stein In Decision

Judge Diamond writes:

Unsuccessful Green Party Candidate Jill Stein and Pennsylvania voter Randall Reitz allege that because Pennsylvania’s voting machines might have been “hacked” during last month’s election, I must order the Commonwealth to conduct a recount of the votes cast for President. There are at least six separate grounds requiring me to deny Plaintiffs’ Motion. Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any “hack” occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised. Moreover, Plaintiffs’ lack of standing, the likely absence of federal jurisdiction, and Plaintiffs’ unexplained, highly prejudicial delay in seeking a recount are all fatal to their claims for immediate relief. Further, Plaintiffs have not met any of the requirements for the issuance of a mandatory emergency injunction. Finally, granting the relief Plaintiffs seek would make it impossible for the Commonwealth to certify its Presidential Electors by December 13 (as required by federal law), thus inexcusably disenfranchising some six million Pennsylvania voters. For all these reasons, I am compelled to refuse Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief.

The only state in which a recount is ongoing is Wisconsin, as a judge ordered a halt to recount efforts in Michigan last week.

There’s still no word as to whether or not Stein intends to issue refunds on the millions of dollars she raised to support her effort.

Full article: Judge Denies Pennsylvania Recount Petition And SLAMS Jill Stein In Decision | The Sean Hannity Show

Save

Advertisements

Comments are closed.