She was willing.
But, she told Fayetteville police, when the sex turned violent, she told the man to stop. He didn’t listen.
She thought what happened to her was rape, but she found out that under North Carolina law a woman is not allowed to back out of sex once it is underway.
“It’s really stupid,” Palmer, 19, said of the law. “If I tell you no and you kept going, that’s rape.”
In 1979, the North Carolina Supreme Court, in State v. Way, ruled that women cannot revoke consent after sexual intercourse begins.
Full article: N.C. law: Woman can’t back out of sex once underway
Wow. I don’t even know where to go with this one. My brain immediately took on the ways this could go bad or go well.
OK, so my initial reaction to this is that it is completely insane. In this woman’s situation, if the sex became violent and she didn’t want to take part in that, she should have had the right to say no, this needs to stop. And when he refused, yes, I would call that rape.
My mind is in a uproar over this, however, because we all know damn well that some woman somewhere is going to claim she told the guy half way through that she wanted to stop and was then raped. Whether she actually told him to stop or not. I mean, how the hell do you prove that she did or did not tell him to stop half way through?!
BUT! Either party should be allowed to say stop at any time during the act and have that respected. It’s still your body, and sex takes an intense amount of trust to engage in.
Let me know what you think here, guys. What’s your take on this?