Gun-Totin’ Left-Wingers Demonstrate at pro-Trump Rally: Is Bloodshed on the Horizon?

Lefties with guns don’t like being filmed, apparently. – Stephen Lemons

Since you don’t every day see groups of left-wingers totin’ semi-automatic rifles, strolling down the sidewalk, I figured I would follow them and record this odd phenomenon via Facebook Live.

Earlier, the spokeswoman told me that someone with the Brown Berets might talk with me, but she later came up as I was recording the group with my iPhone, and told me the Brown Berets were keeping it zipped as well.

She also asked me to stop filming. And I told her I wasn’t going to do that, because we were on public property.


The spokeswoman approached, justifying their request that I not film because they were “trying to protect the safety and identity of our members.”

Since many were hiding their faces already, I didn’t see this as much of an issue. But I informed her that we live in a free society and that means, when you are demonstrating in a public place, the press gets to film you.

Amusingly, a couple of them were filming me with their iPhones as I filmed them. The spokeswoman then raised a new issue: They did not want me to follow them to their cars and film their cars.

After some more back and forth, they told me that their real concern was that I might film their license plates and that’s the reason they were acting this way.


By the way, I did the same thing to the Arizona Liberty Guard at the March4Trump a couple of weeks ago. I followed them, watched them get into their Army surplus trucks, and filmed them until they drove away.

While I was talking to a handful of the lefties, some ran off, got their cars, and came back to pick up their comrades from the south side of Adams Street.

These progressive goons with guns tried to block me, but I did film some them driving away. The denouement of this encounter was especially ludicrous, as you will see if you watch the video that I have posted.

Full article: Lemons: Gun-Totin’ Left-Wingers Demonstrate at pro-Trump Rally: Is Bloodshed on the Horizon? | Phoenix New Times

Hasn’t there already been bloodshed?! I’m sorry, but this is almost the next logical step from crazy left-wing extremists. They haven’t exactly been non-violent and non-threatening to date. They burn down towns, beat up people they don’t agree with, shoot people going in to talks by right leaning speakers, riot at the drop of a hat, send death threats to people they don’t agree with, embolden their followers to harm or kill, ambush first responders, and are starting to use ISIS tactics during all of this! Why is a group of armed lefties trying to intimidate people they don’t agree with a surprise to anyone?!

I don’t support this kind of thing from either side. I don’t care who you are. People in the USA have a Constitutional right to hold protests and rallies. You don’t have a right to intimidate them with guns because you don’t agree with their stance. Period.

Schumer: Democrats will filibuster Gorsuch nomination

Senate hearings on Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch ended Thursday on a confrontational note, with the body’s top Democrat vowing a filibuster that could complicate Gorsuch’s expected confirmation and ultimately upend the traditional approach to approving justices.

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he will vote no on President Trump’s nominee and asked other Democrats to join him in blocking an up-or-down vote on Gorsuch.

Under Senate rules, it requires 60 votes to overcome such an obstacle. Republicans eager to confirm Gorsuch before their Easter recess — and before the court concludes hearing the current term of cases next month — have only 52 senators.

Republicans have vowed Gorsuch will be confirmed even if it means overhauling the way justices have long been approved. Traditionally, senators can force the Senate to muster a supermajority just to bring up the nomination of a Supreme Court justice. If that is reached, the confirmation requires a simple majority.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Schumer said: “If this nominee cannot earn 60 votes — a bar met by each of President Obama’s nominees and George Bush’s last two nominees — the answer isn’t to change the rules. It’s to change the nominee.”

Full article: Schumer: Democrats will filibuster Gorsuch nomination – The Washington Post

And their only real reason is because they are ticked off that Hillary isn’t picking the Supreme Court justice. Oh, and he believes in following the Constitution as it was written. God forbid.

We’re beyond the point where these people need to grow up. Now they need to be removed. What are they going to do, obstruct for four years?

LIVE STREAM: James Comey Testifies On President Trump Wiretapping Claims & Russian Interference

Sanders: America ‘Worships Wealth Rather Than Caring For The Poor.’ Dude, You Own Three Houses.



Source: Sanders: America ‘Worships Wealth Rather Than Caring For The Poor.’ Dude, You Own Three Houses. | Daily Wire

Bernie is a “six-figure socialist.” The man has three houses and at least one expensive car that we know of. But apparently that isn’t OK for the American public. And his worshipers keep falling for his garbage hook, line, and sinker. Is he going to donate two of those three houses to a poor family or two? How about selling them and feeding some people with the money? Or do you prefer taxing the people to death while blowing smoke up their butts and getting rich off of them? I think we know the answer. Too bad his worshipers haven’t figured it out yet.

Liberal Senator Shows Embarrassing Lack Of Understanding Of How ‘Silencers’ Work


Source: Liberal Senator Shows Embarrassing Lack Of Understanding Of How ‘Silencers’ Work | The Sean Hannity Show

It frightens me that we have people in our government trying to make laws based on what they learned in movies. She has obviously never heard a gun fired with a “silencer,” and doesn’t understand why they are only called “silencers” in movies. She also apparently isn’t aware that homemade silencers are all the rage for your local bad guys.

Everything President Trump’s Been Accused of That Obama Did Without All the Media Hysteria

1. Speaking Out Against Illegal Immigration

While Trump has famously been opposed to illegal immigration, lesser known is that both former President Obama (and former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton) spoke out against the practice.

“Even as we are a nation of immigrants, we’re also a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous,” Obama said in a 2014 speech.

Incidentally, President Trump said that he is open to granting legal status for some illegal immigrants, although his proposal would stop short of full citizenship.

2. Deporting Illegal Immigrants

Getty Images/Spencer Platt

The Trump administration’s deportation of criminal aliens has been decried by much of the press. One AP report even sounded the alarms that the president was even authorizing border patrol agents to round up 100,000 illegal immigrants and deport them, which proved to be false.

Former President Obama was responsible for more “deportations” than any other president in American history; Although Snopes rightfully points out that the definition of “deportation” may be misleading, because it doesn’t refer to the actual number of different immigrants deported out of the country.

3. Restricting Immigration

Getty Images/David McNew

The Trump travel ban of immigrants and refugees from seven different Muslim-majority nations, recently revised to eliminate Iraq from the list, has drawn widespread media and activist condemnation. While the Obama administration never banned travel outright, it did slow the processing of immigrants from Iraq to a considerable extent after a threat to the Bowling Green, Kentucky, community in 2011.

4. Having an Attorney General Who Refused to Resign

Getty Images/Brendan Smialowski

The Trump administration has come under fire for Attorney General Jeff Sessions failing to disclose his two meetings with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, though there is no evidence that the Trump campaign was discussed. There have been demands from top Democrats for Sessions to resign.

Former Attorney General Eric Holder arguably lied under oath about not signing an order that targeted Fox News reporter James Rosen — among other things. Even though there were calls for Holder to resign, he left office of his own volition.

5. Making Partisan and Divisive Statements

Getty Images/Alex Wong

While President Trump is notorious for having uttered many phrases in extremely poor taste, and exhibiting unpresidential decorum, there are blinders on about the former president’s own partisan and divisive rhetoric.

“We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose ass to kick,” Obama said after a Gulf oil spill.

“No, no, no. Don’t boo. Vote,” Obama said before the 2012 election. “Voting is the best revenge.”

“I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face,” he also said.

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama also said.

Presidential? You decide.

Complete list: Everything President Trump’s Been Accused of That Obama Did Without All the Media Hysteria

This doesn’t make every little thing he is doing OK, and that isn’t the point of the list or of pointing it out. The point of this is that there is a blatant double standard, as I’ve said before, where things that are perfectly OK for a democrat to do aren’t OK for a republican to do. Things that are bringing media outrage towards the Trump camp brought media swooning and fan boying from the Obama camp. We no longer have a media, and we may be too far divided to get our country back to the base line at this point, which deeply saddens me.

Did the MSM acknowledge far left intolerance?