Bi-Sexual Chick Said Trump Supporters Sent Her ANTI-GAY Slurs – Here’s What COPS Discovered

what-the-hell-is-this-crapTaylor Volk told a local NBC News affiliate that she found one of the notes taped to her door at her off-campus residence, which read “Back to hell” and “#Trump” along with homophobic slurs.

“This is a countrywide epidemic all of a sudden,” she said on Nov. 14. “I just want them to stop.”

She had also posted pictures of notes with homophobic slurs to her Facebook account, NBC reported.

The university investigated the alleged harassment and determined this week that Ms. Volk had fabricated the story.
Read more: Washinton Times

Here is the latest statement from North Park University President David L. Parkyn:

One week ago I wrote to our campus community twice on the same day in related messages. On each occasion the general topic of my communication was to reiterate our campus commitment to civility in our life together. In these messages I stressed that interactions based on hate have no place at North Park.

The second message in particular was prompted by an incident of intolerance that occurred in a student’s off-campus residence. I’m writing today to notify our community that this incident has been fully investigated and resolved. Sadly, we discovered that the incident and related messages were fabricated; the individual responsible for the incident is not continuing as a student at North Park. We are confident there is no further threat of repeated intolerance to any member of our campus community stemming from this recent incident.

Here is the local NBC update:

Hateful notes and emails allegedly sent to a North Park University student were “fabricated,” the school’s president said Tuesday in a statement, and the woman who claimed they were aimed toward her is no longer enrolled at the school.

Full article: BREAKING: Bi-Sexual Chick Said Trump Supporters Sent Her ANTI-GAY Slurs – Here’s What COPS Discovered

She did get one thing right. “This is a countrywide epidemic all of a sudden.”

It is. There have been numerous reports of fabricated hate crimes coming out ever since the election. This uptick in faked hate crimes has been discussed openly by some in the media as well as pundits and bloggers. From Muslim women falsely claiming to have had their head covering torn off to homosexual waitresses writing hate notes to themselves on customers’ receipts, this is really getting out of hand.

And what, exactly, is the end game with that? Your 15 minutes of fame? Your inability to find anything real to back up your claims of everyone who doesn’t agree with you being some kind of -ist or -phobe? Your undying need to be a victim?

Maybe it’s because I don’t think like these people that I can’t figure out the purpose behind it. I don’t know.

LOL!: What Are Those Strange Red Strobe Lights Inside The White House?

BREAKING: What Are Those Strange Red Strobe Lights Inside The White House?

Apparently, there was a red light strobing at the White House.

Then this:

And everyone is all a flutter on Twitter… because of course they are. But there are some funny guesses as to what it could be.

My guesses?

  • Trump is sitting there with a laser pointer at a mirror, flashing that thing as fast as he can, and laughing his butt off.
  • Mad scientist
  • Disco party
  • Someone unplugged an alarm clock, plugged it back in, and then forgot to reset it.
  • The secret service is flashing laser pointers, and one guy is yelling back all the Twitter comments about it so they can all laugh. Alcohol is probably involved.
  • The secret service are into the hookers again.
  • Baron is playing video games.
  • Trump is setting his farts on fire.
  • Baron is setting his farts on fire.
  • Melania is setting her farts on fire.
  • The secret service are setting each other’s farts on fire.
  • Liberal heads exploding.
Comments Off on LOL!: What Are Those Strange Red Strobe Lights Inside The White House? Posted in Humor, WTF?!

Mark Zuckerberg Wants Everyone to Receive a Guaranteed Government Income

Independent Sentinel

“We should explore ideas like universal basic income to give everyone a cushion to try new things,” the billionaire said at his commencement speech to Harvard graduates on Thursday (25 May).

Source: Mark Zuckerberg Wants Everyone to Receive a Guaranteed Government Income

That sounds great, Zuck. But tell me something.

When the government gives everyone a guaranteed income, what happens to the incentive to work? It goes away. So when everyone stops working, where do we get the money to pay that guaranteed income, considering the government is 100% tax payer funded?

What happens to industry? Who runs the grocery store? The internet? Facebook? Car repair shops? The plumbers? Electricians? First responders? Doctors? Nurses? Road repair? Farms? Who runs TV stations and radio stations? Who collects the trash? Who builds homes?

We need less welfare, Zuck. Not more. We need to create an a population full of people who are go-getters, who want to accomplish and create. We need to give people a chance to get out and make our country and our world better. If you get paid to do nothing all day, where is that incentive?


Breastfeeding is Apparently Anti-Feminist Now

I’m sorry, wait a minute.

Tucker is right… men can’t naturally produce milk for a child. So no, there isn’t another “natural” way to feed a child other than breast milk.

Is there a problem with women who can’t produce milk to use formula? No, of course not! You feed your kid however the heck you have to feed your kid!

Is there a problem with letting dad feed the kid from a bottle? NO! Of course not! Please, by all means, mix up some formula or – God forbid – use a breast pump and fill a bottle with breast milk. It’s a wonderful way for a father to bond with his child.

But to insist that breast feeding isn’t natural? I’m sorry… but how the heck did our ancient ancestors survive then? The cavemen weren’t going to the corner store for formula and warming it up in the microwave. The milk a woman naturally produces in order to sustain the life of her child is always more natural than feeding the baby a powdered mixture of fake sustenance you bought from the grocery store. And just because a man can’t produce that milk doesn’t mean mom can’t bottle it so he can feed the kid, too! And just because everyone has to be empowered in a group think kind of manner and all that great stuff doesn’t mean dad should be forced to be the sole feeder of the kid, either! Feeding is a bonding experience with your baby! You should both be taking the opportunity to feed the baby!

Breast feeding is natural! Period! I don’t care what you read somewhere or how empowered you are. If you are too empowered to feed your kid, don’t have one! And if dad is so much of a beta male that he’s crying in his romper because he can’t naturally feed the baby, why are you breeding with him anyway?!

You people are a walking first world problem!!!

This was the Big News Here in NC Today

Language warning for the video:

So this was big news here in NC today. Apparently, the driver of the truck was not charged with anything, and the news people had to hit the streets to find out how offended everyone was about it.

Previous local story on it here and here. Sadly, I can’t find the one from today when the interviewed one of the protesters after finding out the driver would not be charged.

Her issue was that apparently the cops didn’t come to make sure everyone was alright, they didn’t even try to get a plate number or anything. And she had a stream of semi-professionally worded insults for the driver who apparently didn’t care about the plight of the protesters.

  1. Did you care about the plight of the drivers? I mean, you were blocking a major roadway in a big city during the week. Those people were trying to get to work. Jobs they probably couldn’t afford to lose because you were protesting for higher pay at a job you didn’t go to so you could block traffic. Seriously, this truck had a trailer attached. That leads me to believe he was working. Durham is also a city known for medicine… how many of those people you stopped were on the way to chemo treatments, surgeries, and other medical procedures?
  2. You were out there protesting illegally. You didn’t have the proper permits, and the type of protest you were doing was illegal anyway. And you’re complaining the cops didn’t help? Sweetie, you’re lucky the cops didn’t cuff you. Protest in front of government offices and on the sidewalks like normal people. This is not winning hearts and minds.
  3. The guy did a slow roll through the group of protesters, giving them time to get out from the front of his truck (although they chose not to, instead trying to stop the truck – and there was no one behind them to “protect,” nor were they going to stop the truck with their bare hands if there was). He ran over no one. No one was hurt. That’s actually a method of driver training for pro drivers. I was trained when I worked for the armored car companies on how to slow roll through a riot to prevent the crowds from overturning the truck. I’m not saying he was trained this way, but it isn’t an unheard of tactic and was actually the best course of action for him at the time.
  4. What, exactly, was he going to be charged with? He slowed rolled his way through an illegal protest in the middle of the road. He didn’t hurt anyone. The only ones doing anything wrong were the folks blocking traffic.
  5. Why are we vilifying this driver? To hear them talk, this group was protesting for really good reasons and this horrible, evil driver ran them down in cold blood! Before I actually saw the video, I really thought this is what happened. It isn’t. Again, they were illegally blocking traffic. And you don’t need to block traffic to get your point across. Some of those people may support you, and you’re thanking them by putting their jobs at risk by keeping them there. And the driver didn’t run anyone over or hurt anyone. No media bias my behind.

Gun Control Group Briefed ABC’s Designated Survivor Team, Urges Supporters to Thank Show for Gun Episode

Actor Kiefer Sutherland / Getty Images

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, one of the country’s leading gun control groups, said they gave a presentation to the team behind the primetime show starring Kiefer Sutherland.

“Our president Dan Gross presented to members of their team a while back before the season began about representing gun violence on screen and spent time educating them on the issue,” Brendan Kelly, a Brady Campaign spokesman, told the Washington Free Beacon. “It was part of that larger effort I alluded to in [a recent email to Brady supporters] to work with content producers and creators to highlight the issue of gun violence in America and the sensible solutions at our disposal.”

Designated Survivor airs Wednesdays at 10 P.M. EST and focuses on Sutherland’s character Tom Kirkland who becomes president after most of the federal government is killed in a terrorist attack. The April 5 episode of the series, titled “One Hundred Days,” focused on Sutherland’s character laying out the agenda for his struggling administration. Though the episode begins with Sutherland instructing his staff to avoid hot button issues, his wife makes comments in support of gun control that create a media firestorm.

Shortly afterwards, Sutherland is confronted at a town hall by a woman whose daughter was shot to death by her ex-boyfriend. After calling gun control “one of the most divisive, hot-button topics in our nation,” Sutherland lays out his views.

“I believe that the American people have every right to buy and own guns by virtue of the Second Amendment,” Sutherland’s character said. “I would also like to take a moment to quash the myth that somehow gun control is equal to the Federal Government coming into your home and taking your weapons away. Nobody is advocating for that. We need to be doing everything we can to stop guns from falling into the hands of prior felons, people dealing with serious mental-health issues, people on terrorist watch lists. I mean, come on. We need to be using common sense. It’s as simple as that.”

The Brady Campaign said they were happy with how the series portrayed the issue of gun control.

Full article: Gun Control Group Briefed ABC’s Designated Survivor Team, Urges Supporters to Thank Show for Gun Episode – Washington Free Beacon

First off… there will be spoilers.

This is unfortunate. I really like this show and was hoping they wouldn’t go this route. Either way, let’s discuss why this is a ridiculous episode for this show.

If you haven’t seen it, Designated Survivor is basically about a terrorist attack that wiped out 98% of our government, leaving a low level dude to become president. His administration has been plagued by assassination attempts, some secret group trying to take over the government (and the plot line to this, so far, stinks hard of the Manchurian Candidate), leaks, everyone around the new president being completely shady AF, and a brand new catastrophe every week. Truth be told, the show is extremely stressful to watch, but I actually have enjoyed it to date, although I watch it via Hulu and am several weeks behind.

Now, apparently, the latest episode goes into gun control.

Pardon me a moment. But the entire government was just blown up. This guy’s cabinet hasn’t been completed yet. There is almost no Senate or Congress. The brand new VP just got killed by his creepy assed wife after he ordered them to shoot to kill the guy who shot the president and some other shady things. They are dealing with leakers and possible traitors right there in the White House…

If this was going on in real life, gun control wouldn’t even be an issue on the radar, much less discussed. There would be so many other issues of much higher importance that I don’t think 99.9% of the country or the government would be paying much mind to gun control issues. And if it was the first thing on the list for someone in government, I’m pretty sure we’d just hand them some coloring books and tell them to shut up while the adults put the country back together.

So why on Earth did they even find it necessary to put this topic in there?! I’m sure the leftists are rejoicing, as you saw from the gun control group they consulted. Everyone else is sitting there thinking like me… I’m sorry, isn’t there something else you need to be focusing your attention on? This is absurd!

I understand they have a leftist agenda to push, and they have been doing it the entire show. But if they want the show to hang around, maybe attempting some semblance of how something like this would play out would be best. And things like social issues and hot button topics are not going to reign supreme if this was real life.

Cosmo Magazine Calls Bill And Hillary Clinton “Good Marriage Role Models”

Only the sex-obsessed writers at Cosmopolitan could try that line out. There are a lot of ways to try to defend the Clintons, but that’s not one.

In the article The Clintons and the Reality of a Long Marriage, the women’s magazine attempts to make the case that the Clinton marriage is actually one that everyone should look up to. Apparently, hating philandering men is no longer a part of the feminist agenda. At least, as long as one’s wife is running for president.

Bill Cllinton’s lengthy stroll down memory lane reminded Cosmo writer Ada Calhoun that the Clintons’ 45-year marriage has “outlasted the Gores, the first two Trump marriages, and the first two Gingrich marriages.” Wow, rather a low bar. Why not throw in Elizabeth Taylor or Henry VIII?

The article attacks divorcees Trump, Giuliani, and Gingrich for all being critical of Hillary standing by her cheating man. These men, Calhoun laments, think “you should have the ‘decency’ to leave your spouse” if you cheat on them. Never mind the decency to not cheat on them in the first place, right Bill?

But virtuous Hillary Clinton stuck by her man! She “could have put her husband’s recklessness behind her like a bad haircut and moved on to continue her change-making and achievements without him too. But she stayed.” And now, the sweet old couple “get to be doting grandparents together, mutually supporting each other in their latest acts, and potentially becoming the first married to couple to ever both be President, which will make a good Christmas letter.”

Full article: Cosmo Magazine Calls Bill And Hillary Clinton “Good Marriage Role Models” – American Lookout


Their marriage is based on a desire for power and nothing else. Bill has done half of D.C. Hillary hasn’t had a facial expression that wasn’t forced since 1962. Yeah, this is the model I want for a marriage!