FLASHBACK: Democrats Threaten Republicans With Violence

Our first incident comes via Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit, who catalogues the numerous times in which President Obama’s issued ominous threats against his political opposition. Perhaps the most notable incident came in 2008 when then-candidate Obama told an audience in Philadelphia, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we’ll bring a gun…Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl.”

In one particularly egregious incident, CBS’s Late Late Show With Craig Kilborn, showed a photograph of President Bush with the words “Snipers Wanted” superimposed over the image.

In 2006, Hollywood produced a movie entitled “Death of a President”, in which George W. Bush is shown being gunned down by a sniper.

Full article: FLASHBACK: Democrats Threaten Republicans With Violence | The Sean Hannity Show

And let’s not forget the numerous occasions over the last seven and a half years where liberals publicly called for the mass murder of NRA members, Republicans, and anyone else that didn’t agree with them 100% on everything, many of which have been chronicled here.

You folks need to sit down now and get off your faux outrage bandwagon. Just because they are democrats doesn’t make it OK.



Media slam Obama’s post-Paris attacks speech

Apparently we’re only supposed to care about American lives? Is this dude high?

Rasmussen Poll: 47 Percent Say Obama Has Driven Races Apart

Nearly half of Americans say that President Barack Obama has caused further division among racial groups in the United States, according to a new Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday.

Forty-seven percent of 1,000 likely voters surveyed on Monday and Tuesday said that Obama, the nation’s first African-American president, has driven the races further apart.

That compared with only 20 percent who said that Obama, who was first elected in 2008, has brought the races closer together. In addition, 27 percent said the president’s words and actions have had no major impact either way.

The Rasmussen survey has a margin of error of 3 percent.

In other findings, 44 percent of black voters feel Obama has brought America together, versus only 16 percent of whites.

And 54 percent of white voters believe Obama has driven the races further apart, compared with only 21 percent of African Americans.

The results are similar to a Bloomberg poll taken last year that showed According to a Bloomberg Politics poll, 53 percent believe race relations have worsened under Obama, 36 percent think they are unchanged, and only 9 percent believe they have improved.

Source: Rasmussen Poll: 47 Percent Say Obama Has Driven Races Apart

I am astounded it is this low. Is everyone else living under a rock?

Oh. No. They’re afraid of being called a racist for agreeing that he’s bad for race relations.

Obama has Big, Scary Plans that Don’t End with His Presidency

Narcissism is an interesting illness, isn’t it?
Obama has big plans on what to do after the end of his presidency in 2016. We all know how much he loves his money, so this report exposes a very logical path for him to take once he loses his power.Reporters Michael D. Shear and Gardiner Harris reveal the

“methodical effort taking place inside and outside the White House as the president, first lady, and a cadre of top aides map out a post-presidential infrastructure and endowment they estimate could cost as much as $1 billion”

This is about as much as Obama was able to fundraise for his 2012 re-election campaign.

This effort, which began in November 2012, shortly after his re-election, took place when the president hosted filmmaker Steven Spielberg at the White House for a screening of Lincoln. The Times reported that President Obama was “spellbound about the use of technology to tell stories.”

Such technology, could also be used to tell Obama’s story — to somehow convince future Americans, against all evidence to the contrary, that his presidency was an experience they would like to repeat.

One adviser noted that “Ideally a person in Kenya could put on a pair of virtual reality goggles and be transported to Mr. Obama’s 2008 speech on race in Philadelphia.”

Obama has Big, Scary Plans that Don’t End with His Presidency – BuzzPo.

A Man With A Plan, A Phone And A Pen

Photo credit: Drop of Light/Shutterstock.com

A Unified Agenda To Attack Gun Rights From Every Direction

Make no mistake: There’s a method to Obama’s madness. His strategy is simple:

  • Steadily expand the list of characteristics that disqualify a person from gun ownership;
  • Steadily narrow the list of firearms and ammunition that Americans are allowed to own;
  • Ban one bullet here … ban one gun thereblock gun imports hererestrict gun accessories there … chip away at the edges, divide and demonize hunters, sow division among gun owners, then attack them one-by-one from every angle until nothing is left.

To see this pincers strategy at work, just look at how Obama’s BATFE floated a proposal to ban “green tip” M855 ammunition—one of the most popular rounds for AR-15 and other 5.56×45 mm rifles.

The details of this scheme are convoluted and, to many, confusing. But to boil it down, Obama’s BATFE suddenly decided that because M855 ammunition (like virtually all centerfire rifle ammunition) will penetrate bullet-resistant body armor, and because AR-15 handguns are available that will fire this round, therefore the ammunition should be banned under the law that bans armor-piercing handgun bullets. Indeed, BATFE Director B. Todd Jones testified before a U.S. Senate committee in March that he considers not just M855 but also all 5.56 ammo to be a threat to law-enforcement officers.

Never mind that no police officer has ever been killed by an M855 round penetrating body armor. Never mind that handguns have been available that will fire this ammunition for over 30 years. Never mind that M855 ammunition has been lawfully sold and used by millions of Americans for plinking, target shooting and defense for decades. And never mind that the M855 doesn’t penetrate body armor any better, and is actually less powerful, than the ammunition millions of deer hunters use every year.

The whole scheme was built on lies. For a prime example, just look at former Obama campaigner Marjorie Clifton, who falsely claimed on Fox News that M855 ammunition “has been used in every mass shooting we’ve had in the country over past years.”

The NRA mobilized gun owners nationwide to submit comments to ATF to oppose the proposed ban on M855 ammunition, and the Obama administration backed off from the proposal—for now.

But you can bet they’ll be back as soon as they get an opportunity to do so.

“Universal Bullet Ban”?

And whether or not you own an AR-15 or any rifle that fires 5.56 ammunition, the fact is this anti-gun gambit against M855 could be “transformed” into a universal bullet ban.

Consider this: Environmentalists have been trying for years to ban lead ammunition as an “environmental hazard.” The Center for Biological Diversity filed multiple lawsuits in federal court to try to force the EPA to ban lead ammunition under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The NRA stopped them—for now—but you can bet they’ll be back with new legal theories to push their ban. Indeed, California banned lead ammunition for hunting two years ago.

So if lead ammunition is banned, what will hunters and gun owners use? The obvious answer is non-lead “green ammo,” whose bullets are made from some other metal than lead—brass, bronze, copper, tungsten or some combination, just to name a few.

But if non-lead-containing “green ammunition” is outlawed under BATFE’s M855 ammo ban … and lead-containing ammunition is banned as an environmental hazard, what’s left?

Guns won’t work without projectiles. And the ballistic coefficient of marshmallows is terrible.

That’s what I mean when I call this a “pincer movement.” But it’s just one of the ways the Obama administration is attacking gun owners, guns, ammunition and the Second Amendment freedom to own them.

A whole lot more via America’s 1st Freedom | A Man With A Plan, A Phone And A Pen. Long article, but good read.

Obama Delivers Deathblow to Coal with Clean Power Plan

Amid all the promises President Barack Obama has broken since he has occupied the White House, he’s kept one: his promise to destroy the coal industry.

In 2008, candidate Obama remarked, “If somebody wants to build a coal-fired power plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them. … Under my plan … electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” Four major coal companies have filed for bankruptcy in just the past 15 months.

In this Jan. 20, 2015 file photo, a plume of steam billows from the coal-fired Merrimack Station in Bow, N.H. President Barack Obama on Monday, Aug. 3, 2015, unveiled the final version of his unprecedented regulations clamping down on carbon dioxide emissions from existing U.S. power plants. The Obama administration first proposed the rule last year. Opponents plan to sue immediately to stop the rule’s implementation. (AP Photo/Jim Cole, File)

Obama has waged a sustained war on coal. The newly unveiled final Clean Power Plan (CPP) for new and existing power plants is a knife to the heart of the entire coal industry, from mining to transportation to power plants to the American energy consumer. It’s Obama’s coup de grace for a once-vibrant industry that served as the backbone of the American Industrial Revolution and the nation’s global economic dominance. It could still provide cheap, clean power if Obama would only let up.

Obama’s CPP requires states to develop individualized plans to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, by an average of 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. This is an even steeper cut than the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) originally proposed.

Obama’s misguided focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to prevent a completely theoretical anthropogenic climate change catastrophe is destroying U.S. jobs, threatening electric power reliability and affordability, and doing absolutely nothing to prevent climate change. By the administration’s own estimates, the Clean Power Plan would reduce future global temperature by less than a hundredth of a degree, an amount thermometers can’t even measure.

Obama’s climate obsession comes at a high price for electric power ratepayers. Since Obama ascended to the presidency, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports coal’s share of the nation’s electric supply fell from 48 percent in 2007 to 39 percent in 2014. Because coal is a low-cost source of electricity, electric power prices have risen 15 percent since Obama became president, despite historically low inflation.

An analysis of EPA’s initial proposal, which would have required emissions to be 30 percent below 2005 by 2030, by NERA Economic Consulting shows U.S. ratepayers would have seen their electric power prices rise an additional 13 percent above inflation. This amounts to the average household paying as much as $4,157 more for electricity over the life of the Clean Power Plan. And because electricity prices will rise for businesses as well, wages and disposable income will fall short of what they would otherwise be without CPP.

Because Obama’s CPP requires even more emissions cuts than the NERA analysis took into account, costs will be even higher. Higher costs, less income, and all to prevent a temperature increase of less than a one-hundredth of a degree. Talk about hot air!

via Obama Delivers Deathblow to Coal with Clean Power Plan.

Obama Says “We have to brainwash Americans to accept gun control”

“If congress had passed some common sense gun reforms after Newtown, after a group of children had been gunned down in their own classroom.

guns in school 1Reforms that 90% of the American people supported, we wouldn’t have prevented every act of violence, or even most, we don’t know if it would have prevented what would have happened in Charleston, but we might still have some more Americans with us,” Obama said.

“I know today’s politics less like that we will see any serious gun safety legislation. Ultimately, congress will follow the people. At some point in the country, we have reckon with what happens. It’s not good enough to show sympathy.

You don’t see murder on this kind of scale, with this kind of frequency, in any other advanced nation on Earth. Every country has violent, hateful, or mentally unstable people. What’s different is not every country is a wash with easily accessible guns. I refuse… to pretend that it’s simply sufficient enough to grieve, and that any mention of us doing something to stop it is somehow politicizing the problem.”

“We need a change in attitudes, among attitudes: lawful gun owners, those who are unfamiliar with guns. We have to have a conversation about it and fix this. And ultimately congress acts when the public insists on action.

And we’ve seen how public opinion can change. We’ve seen it change on gay marriage, we’ve seen it beginning to change on climate change. We have to change how we think about this issue. We as a people have got to change.”

Yet, as CowgerNation reports, facts show that violent crime and homicide rates increase after gun bans are enacted.

Obama Says “We have to brainwash Americans to accept gun control, like we did with gay marriage”.